Woodpecker vs Saleshandy (2026): Feature-by-Feature Guide & Price Comparison

Picking between Woodpecker and Saleshandy?

Woodpecker promises ease of use, better mailbox rotation, and deliverability. 

But is it worth burning a hole in your pocket?

Saleshandy claims an even better deliverability, AI, and advanced features at the best price. 

But do they fare well when it comes to actual cold email outreach?
And which one is the best for you and your team?

So, I ran both Woodpecker and Saleshandy against ten critical tests. 

I weighed each one on their setup, campaigns, personalization, deliverability, and many more. 

Keep reading to find out which cold email platform stands out for you in 2026!

Woodpecker vs Saleshandy: Quick Feature Breakdown

In a hurry?

I put together what we concluded in this blog. 

You can compare and choose the best for your team and cold outreach efforts!

Want a quick comparison between Saleshandy and Woodpecker? Watch this short video.

Woodpecker vs Saleshandy: Full Side-By-Side Comparison of Features

Had a quick glance at what Woodpecker and Saleshandy are best at?

Now, let us have a deeper look at how they stack up against each other.

Below are the ten tests I have run Woodpecker and Saleshandy against:

1. Woodpecker vs Saleshandy: Pricing and Cost Efficiency
2. Woodpecker vs Saleshandy: Outreach Campaign Management
3. Woodpecker vs Saleshandy: Outreach Sequence Automation
4. Woodpecker vs Saleshandy: Scalability, Deliverability, and Warm-Up
5. Woodpecker vs Saleshandy: Personalization Capabilities for Emails
6. Woodpecker vs Saleshandy: Built-In Platform Integrations
7. Woodpecker vs Saleshandy: B2B Lead Database
8. Woodpecker vs Saleshandy: Agency and Team Collaboration Tools
9. Woodpecker vs Saleshandy: Prospect Management & Reply Management
10. Woodpecker vs Saleshandy: Reporting and Analytics

1. Woodpecker vs Saleshandy: Pricing and Cost Efficiency

First, let us weigh both Woodpecker & Saleshandy’s pricing. 

Top five aspects you might want to evaluate:

Woodpecker: Pricing & Cost Efficiency

While Woodpecker says you can try all its features for free, 
you will need to subscribe to even try their LinkedIn automation.

Coming to its monthly pricing:

• Base monthly price: Woodpecker’s Starter pack is $35 per month (offering only limited features)
• Discounted annual price: Starter pack comes down to $24 per month

I was surprised to see Woodpecker charging high for basic features, 
which usually come included in most Starter plans.

So, is Woodpecker affordable for you?
Let me show you with some quick pros and cons so you can decide:

There are no “hidden” costs in Woodpecker. 
But make sure to use their calculator with the add-on cost for a clear figure.

My take: 

For non-agencies, Woodpecker’s pricing works best for freelancers & small businesses. 

Costs 3x higher to contact more than 2,000 prospects a month. 

It can cost $300/year, higher than Saleshandy for basic features, even for non-agencies! 

Saleshandy: Pricing & Cost Efficiency

You can get a 7-day free trial on any of Saleshandy’s plans, with zero limitations. 

• Base monthly price: The Outreach Starter pack stands at $36 
• Base annual price: Starter pack comes down to $25

While the lead finder credits cost slightly higher,
what I liked is that these credits do not expire.

And I can still use them if my subscription ends! 

I also do not have to pay per-client seat, for warm-up, or for native integrations.

2. Woodpecker vs Saleshandy: Outreach Campaign Management

For the second test, once I began using both tools,
I realized how differently they approach campaign management. 

I evaluated Woodpecker and Saleshandy on these fronts:

Woodpecker: Outreach Campaign Management

When I first logged into Woodpecker, it took a little while to get used to its layout.

The interface is minimalistic but a bit outdated for those looking for modern tools. 

It took a few extra seconds for things to load,

And the navigation between sections was not as intuitive. 

Once I got past that, the campaign management setup was surprisingly capable. 

The tool lets you:

•  Manage campaign schedules
• Set up conditioned follow-ups
• Add prospects 

…all from one unified view! 

It also shows a campaign summary once you have built your setup. 

Best-suited plan for the above features: Growth plan for 30,000 prospects at $306/month or $459/month.

Add-ons:

• $27/month per active client (Agency add-on)
• $5/month per active client for white label reporting
• $20/month for integrations

Warm-up is free for up to 30 inboxes.

For 30,000 prospects (5 clients, white label, & integrations): $486/month

This is twice as costly as Saleshandy’s most premium plan (100k prospects)!

My take:

Woodpecker can be ideal if you need deep client control, but it gets very expensive. 

For teams looking for advanced features at a reasonable fixed price, I recommend Saleshandy.

Saleshandy: Outreach Campaign Management

Saleshandy felt modern and intuitive. It was also extremely fast to set up!

Creating my first campaign took just a few minutes. 

I uploaded prospects, connected my email, and set up follow-ups in one clean flow.

In the time it took me to understand Woodpecker, 
I had already begun setting up my first campaign in Saleshandy!

Similar to Woodpecker, everything, from prospect tracking to analytics, is presented in a single, clean dashboard. 

Yes, even on a campaign level.

I can check deliverability, open/reply rates, and campaign progress without switching tabs.

The best part is that Saleshandy’s base plan supports unlimited sender accounts.

Saleshandy’s bulk email operations also impressed me!

I could select multiple accounts at once to:

• Edit sending settings
• Hyper-personalize with AI
• Update signatures, associate clients 
• Refresh setup scores 
• Disconnect/delete accounts 

Recommended plan: Outreach Scale ($139/mo) for 30,000 prospects.

Add-ons:

• $79 to verify 25,000 emails
• $57 for 1,000 credits to reveal extra email & phone numbers 
• $23 for 15 inbox placement tests (or) $79 for unlimited inbox placement tests

The Outreach Scale plan also unlocks:

• Dedicated client management panel
• Bulk campaign actions 
• Client-level analytics 
• White-label branding 

For 30,000 prospects (5 clients, white label, integrations, AND inbox placement): 

Just $298 to $354 per month (unlimited inbox tests)

3. Woodpecker vs Saleshandy: Outreach Sequence Automation

For the third test on email sequence automation, 
this is what I looked at:

Woodpecker: Outreach Sequence Automation

For sequence creation, Woodpecker supports:

• Conditioned follow-ups
• Yes/no logic across email, LinkedIn, calls, or SMS

Woodpecker’s AI also analyzes replies for interest levels. 
But overall, the workflow for triggers and snippets took time to understand. 

Also, it supports only five email variations. 
I also have to give an AI prompt for each variation manually.

The AI-assist is very basic, and I was not satisfied with its email copy.

This is because Woodpecker’s AI does not analyze my:
business, product, offer, ICP, and goals – like Saleshandy does.

Saleshandy: Outreach Sequence Automation

Creating email sequences on Saleshandy was easier. 

I can create three types of sequences on Saleshandy:

• Multi-step: Unlimited automatic follow-ups
• AI Copilot: Generate ready-to-launch sequences from ICP & offer inputs
• Conditional sequence: Triggered by opens, clicks, or replies

The AI Sequence Copilot genuinely impressed me with the quality of campaigns it generated.

Hyper-personalization is also easy:
It has merge tags, spintax, etc., and they are very easy to use! 

Saleshandy has added a native dialer directly inside the platform.

I can add call steps in my sequences alongside email and LinkedIn. When I make a call, it runs right in the browser. No app downloads, no plugins.

Every call is automatically logged to the prospect’s CRM timeline, right next to emails and LinkedIn activity. Calls are recorded, transcribed, and summarized by AI.

So if I need to pick up a conversation days later, the full context is already there.

This matters for the comparison. One of the most common criticisms of Saleshandy was that it was email-only. That is no longer true.

Woodpecker supports LinkedIn steps (at $29/account/month as an add-on) and manual call tasks, but it does not have a built-in dialer. You still need a separate calling tool.

Dialer pricing: Starter at $23/month (annual), Pro at $55/month (annual). The first US phone number comes free with any plan.

With email, LinkedIn, calls, and WhatsApp all trackable in one CRM, Saleshandy is now a proper multichannel outreach platform.

Use this quick table to instantly spot which platform performs better for your specific priorities.

4. Woodpecker vs Saleshandy: Scalability, Deliverability, and Warm-Up

For the fourth test, I analyzed how well they handle large-scale outreach.

This is without hurting the sender’s reputation or inbox placement rates.

Keep these five questions in mind when evaluating:

Woodpecker: Scalability, Deliverability, and Warm-Up

Woodpecker offers a lot of technical control but little automation beyond the basics. 

It is functional, but I had to stay hands-on to keep things running.

Scalability

Woodpecker is designed to handle multiple accounts and campaigns. 

But scaling can feel clunky after a point. 

There is a loading issue that becomes constant once you reach 20+ accounts. 

Real-time syncing also lags during large uploads.

A/B testing is also capped at five variants per campaign. 

And there’s no API for true bulk cold emailing. 

You will need Zapier or webhooks. 

Deliverability also dips if you push volume aggressively. 

This is because there is no auto throttling or account failover. 

Deliverability

• SPF/DKIM checks
• Spam testing 
• Bounce monitoring 
• Adaptive sending 

Woodpecker includes useful tools like:

But most of these only flag if there is a problem, and will not fix them automatically. 

During my test, inbox rates dropped when I switched between domains. 

The recovery required manual SPF/DKIM edits. 

Bounce handling also needs manual review for soft bounces, and this slowed my campaign. 

Small teams can benefit from randomized send times & custom tracking domains.

But for larger campaigns, you would need someone to monitor metrics manually.

Warm-Up

The warm-up tool is an add-on at $5 per inbox. But I found it quite manual.

It does not auto-generate warm content or simulate natural replies beyond basics. 

There is also no real-time scoring or reputation insights. You just have to wait and observe metrics.

Saleshandy: Scalability, Deliverability, and Warm-Up

Saleshandy’s features to protect email deliverability and simplify warm-up impressed me.

Scalability

From a scaling perspective, Saleshandy is excellently designed.

It supports:

• Unlimited sending accounts (even in the base plan)
• Strong sender rotation 
• Tiered higher volumes for agencies/larger teams 

In my testing, managing multiple accounts and scaling to large lists,

Felt more fluid compared to Woodpecker. 

But you may notice some interface slowdowns when scaling at an enterprise level. 

Deliverability

Saleshandy has built-in deliverability tools:

• Automatic sender rotation 
• Spam-word detection 
• Sequence scoring (domain auth, list health, content)

The detailed deliverability metrics really stood out, compared to Woodpecker!

Their Inbox Radar allows me to test how my emails land across providers before I go live.

This is an important, smart safety net for cold emails.

That said, the tool still depends on your infrastructure (domains, ESPs) & best practices.

Warm-Up

I found that Saleshandy made warm-up easier than Woodpecker.

You can ramp volume slowly, automatically manage sending schedules, 
And even warm multiple accounts in parallel.

In practice, I found this very smooth. 
I do not have to build everything from scratch.

Still, it is not an entirely “set and forget” warm-up. 

You can monitor engagement and adjust if replies are low or volumes jump too fast. 

This table helps you quickly compare both tools side by side:

5. Woodpecker vs Saleshandy: Personalization Capabilities for Emails

For the fifth test in our evaluation, I tested personalization capabilities. 

I prioritized how well each tool lets you go beyond basic features:

Woodpecker: Personalization Capabilities for Emails

When I explored Woodpecker’s personalization setup, I found it surprisingly detailed. 

The editor gives you 20+ dynamic variables.
This has all the basics {{First Name}} and {{Company}} to {{LinkedIn URL}}. 

To personalize further, you can set up your own variable (or “Snippet”).
You do not have to switch tools or add code. 

What stood out most was its conditional logic (if/else) system. 

For example, you can build your own rules like:
“If {{Industry}} = ‘SaaS,’ mention {{Snippet}}”

But you have to set your own Snippets individually. You can scale easily once done. 

You get a live personalization preview only before sending. 
So you can miss variables or formatting errors, especially when sending in bulk. 

But I was disappointed with their basic AI content suggestion. 

I have to manually enter my ICP, context, and product offering for the AI in every email.

This is also why:
If a prospect clicks or replies, my email copy cannot adapt mid-sequence without manual updates.

Lastly, it integrates well with external data. 

You can upload CSVs with custom fields or sync CRM data from HubSpot or Salesforce.

My take?

Woodpecker does nail the structured side of personalization. 

But it lacks the creative intelligence of newer cold email platforms these days.

Saleshandy: Personalization Capabilities for Emails

Comparatively, Saleshandy’s email personalization features felt more like an intelligent system.

With its AI, you can make every cold email sound like you wrote it yourself. 
You just have to enter the inputs once. 

I could use 30+ merge tags and dynamic fields. 

With basics, it also has advanced tags:

• {{Prospect Overview}}, {{Company Revenue}}, etc.
• Sender tags like {{SenderFirstName}}, etc.
• Time-based tags such as {{CurrentDate + N}}, {{Current Date}}, etc.
• Calendar-based tags for {{NextWorkingDate}}, {{NextQuarter}}, etc.

I can randomize greetings and sign-offs to improve my reply rates and inbox placement. 

One can save hours of manual personalization!

I loved their ‘Spin Syntax,’ where it automatically creates variations of sentences or words!

I can generate up to 26 unique email variations from a single template. 

Saleshandy’s conditional personalization, or Subsequence, is a lifesaver. 

It automatically adapts a sequence based on each prospect’s behavior/attributes. 

Think of it like:

• If replied = interested -> Wait ‘n’ days -> move to value subsequence 
• If open count > 5 AND if they are tagged ICP -> trigger follow-up subsequence 
• If tag = French -> move to French language subsequence 

It is a smart audit in the Content guide that grades personalization. 
It also flags repetitive phrases and spammy words. 

To boot, I can add a pre-header or an email preview text.

Quickly scan this table to see which platform truly delivers more value for your specific use case.

6. Woodpecker vs Saleshandy: Built-In Platform Integrations

In the sixth test, I evaluated both tools’ platform integrations.

Some important questions I looked at:

Woodpecker: Built-In Platform Integrations

Woodpecker’s integrations are selective, but deep. 

I can connect my HubSpot and Pipedrive accounts in just a few clicks. 
Replies automatically update deal stages. That is a big win.

Their lead integration syncs also felt native and quick for lead imports.

Unfortunately, syncing happens hourly, not instantly. 
For pipelines that move fast, this lag stands out. 

Saleshandy: Built-In Platform Integrations

Saleshandy also integrates well and automates across systems.
Its native links to HubSpot, Salesforce, Zoho, Pipedrive, Persana, etc.

Once I integrated Slack and Close via Zapier, I could build logic-based actions.

For example:

If a reply comes in → Auto update Salesforce deal → Ping Slack → Start subsequence 

It also features built-in lead sourcing with Lead Finder, so I did not have to rely on external imports.

Saleshandy’s AI also recognized data from enrichment tools and triggered next steps automatically.

MCP (Model Context Protocol) lets you control your Saleshandy account from AI tools like Claude, ChatGPT, or n8n using natural language prompts.

You can create sequences, pull reports, or manage prospects without opening the Saleshandy dashboard.

For teams that already work inside AI assistants, this removes a layer of context-switching.

Woodpecker does not currently offer either of these.

This table makes it easy to identify which tool performs better — feature by feature.

7. Woodpecker vs Saleshandy: B2B Lead Database

The seventh test was focused on Woodpecker and Saleshandy’s B2B lead database. 

What did I look at?

Woodpecker: B2B Lead Database

Woodpecker’s Lead Finder add-on gives access to over 1 billion B2B emails.

They are aggregated from trusted providers like People Data Labs, Prospeo, Datagma, etc.

The accuracy is also impressive; users report 92% to 95% valid emails in core markets (US/EU).

I liked that its data is refreshed every 30 to 45 days with job change signals via Datagma.

I could apply 8-10 filters to define my ICP. 

Since there is no AI-based auto-suggestion for ICPs, I found it a bit manual.

Since email verification is completely free, all emails are validated before a campaign. 

While titles and firmographics are enriched,
phone data is not supported unless using third-party tools.

For pricing, you get 100 free credits/month, with paid tiers at $49 per 1,000 leads. 

This is pretty affordable for SMBs doing small to mid-scale prospecting. 

Saleshandy: B2B Lead Finder Database

Saleshandy’s Lead Finder gives you access to an 800M+ contact database with 60M+ companies.

What stood out to me was the AI Lead Search.

I typed a plain-English description of my ideal prospect, and it generated a filtered, verified lead list without me touching a single filter manually.

That said, the 75+ advanced filters are still there if you want granular control.

You can filter by company name, location, company size, role and seniority, revenue, funding stage, tech stack, and even buying signals and news data.

The other thing Woodpecker does not offer is waterfall enrichment. Saleshandy cross-references multiple data providers to surface the most accurate email and phone number for each contact.

Instead of getting one data source’s best guess, you get a layered verification process that catches what a single provider would miss.

Credits do not expire, even if your subscription ends.

Moreover, AI Prospect Enrichment uses LLM models and live web search to pull context about each prospect before outreach.

Think recent company news, role changes, or LinkedIn activity. This data feeds into personalization, so cold emails reference something specific about the prospect instead of relying on generic merge tags alone.

You also get 50 free credits when you sign up to test data quality before committing to a paid plan.

My take:

Woodpecker has a larger raw database. But Saleshandy’s data quality layer with waterfall enrichment and buying signals gave me more usable contacts per search.

When I compared 500 leads from each tool, Saleshandy’s bounce rate was noticeably lower.

For anyone deciding between the two, this table summarizes the key takeaways at a glance.

8. Woodpecker vs Saleshandy: Agency and Team Collaboration Tools

In the eighth test on agency/team handling, I asked five important questions:

Woodpecker: Agency & Team Collaboration Tools

Woodpecker is designed to keep outreach organized,
with shared inboxes, role permissions, and notifications.

For large agencies, Woodpecker has a slight edge. 

Its Agency Panel add-on ($27/month per active client) gives full control.

It provides features like:

• Bulk campaign actions 
• Separate prospect databases 
• Domain audits 
• Global blacklist 
• Centralized billing 

Its multi-client dashboard stores all client campaigns, replies, bounces, and metrics in one place.

Each account is isolated to prevent data leaks. 
And admins can assign access per role. 

Clients can also get view-only dashboards to track their performance. 

You can also toggle between client campaigns instantly, and sequence sharing across teams is easy.

In practice, I found this setup ideal for small to mid-sized agencies (5-25 clients). 

But once you cross 25+ clients, dashboard load times increase. Filters also feel limited.

Let me walk you through some quick pros and cons:

Saleshandy: Agency & Team Collaboration Tools

Saleshandy is built for agencies and scaling outreach teams that 
manage multiple clients and email accounts.

I could manage unlimited workspaces and clients under one account. 
No per-seat cost like Woodpecker.

Its shared inbox centralizes replies from all mailboxes,
and automatically detects intent (positive/negative/OOO).

White labeling lets agencies brand their portals, reports, & sending domains. 

PS: Saleshandy also has a mobile app! You can manage client conversations on the go.

Compare the two tools in one place. A quick way to find which one truly aligns with your priorities.

9. Woodpecker vs Saleshandy: Prospect Management & Reply Management

For the ninth test, I realized this is where most teams either save hours or lose them.

Woodpecker: Prospect Reply Management

When I explored Woodpecker’s reply management,
It felt built for teams who prioritize control.

The Inbox brings together all replies, bounces, and OOO emails. 

Once a reply lands, the sequence immediately stops. 

That is huge if you want to avoid sending follow-ups after someone responds.

Replies are tagged based on interest level. You can even filter by campaign level or sender.

For agency teams, shared inboxes and comment access were handy. 

Each teammate can easily view or respond.

Saleshandy: Prospect Reply Management

Saleshandy’s reply management felt like the next step up. 

The Unified Inbox pulled replies from all connected mailboxes. 
It also categorizes them instantly with built-in AI detection.

It auto-pauses sequences, detects out-of-office messages, and flags follow-up opportunities.

Beyond reply handling, Saleshandy now includes a built-in outbound CRM that replaced the old Prospects tab.

This was the upgrade I did not expect when I reopened the platform. Instead of rows in a table, prospects are now organized in a Kanban-style pipeline.

I can create custom stages like Not Contacted, Replied, Interested, Follow-up Needed, or Closed, and drag prospects between stages as conversations progress.

Each prospect card opens into a full activity timeline. Every email sent, reply received, open, click, note, task, and sequence activity shows up in one chronological view.

Before I follow up with anyone, I already know exactly what happened last and what needs to happen next.

I can also send 1:1 emails directly from the CRM, outside of any sequence.
If a prospect replies to a cold email and needs a custom response, I handle it right there.

Tasks and notes round it out. I can create follow-up tasks for calls, LinkedIn messages, or WhatsApp. I can tag team members, and pin important fields like deal value, demo date, or funding stage.

Woodpecker does not have anything like this built in. Prospect data in Woodpecker lives inside campaign lists.

If you want CRM-level tracking, you need HubSpot, Salesforce, or Pipedrive on top of it, plus the $20/month integration add-on.

With Saleshandy, the CRM is native. No extra cost. No sync delays. Every touchpoint across email, calls, and LinkedIn lives in one place.

This breakdown helps you instantly recognize each tool’s strengths and trade-offs.

10. Woodpecker vs Saleshandy: Analytics and Performance Reporting

Finally, for the last test, I looked at each tool’s reporting capabilities.

Woodpecker: Analytics & Performance Reporting

When I explored Woodpecker’s reporting, it felt like a clean control room.

Every metric, from opens to unsubscribes, is all lined up with a campaign-level breakdown.

You can track:

• Open rates (clicked, opt-out)
• Invalids, bounces, delivered, and sent
• Response rates (positive, neutral, or negative sentiment)

For agencies, shared dashboards and permission-based access were helpful. 

Each client’s results can be viewed separately.

The CSV and PDF formats were great for client summaries.
But you have to generate them manually.

Saleshandy: Analytics & Performance Reporting 

Saleshandy’s analytics feel far more modern. 

Right from the dashboard, I saw performance snapshots in colorful, visual blocks. 

Yes, along with funnel-style breakdowns and reply trends.

You can track:

• Bounces and emails sent
• Contacted prospects 
• Open rates 
• Reply rates
• Unsubscribe rates
• Positive sentiment and negative sentiment 

I can filter my campaign analytics based on the above filters.
I could also view reports by prospect and by emails sent.

A quick side-by-side view to help you spot the stronger tool without reading every detail.

Verdict? Scale Faster With Saleshandy, Control Manually With Woodpecker

Both Woodpecker and Saleshandy are great cold email platforms. 

But when you compare them across:

Deep personalization, prospect reply management, and overall workflow, Saleshandy pulls ahead.

It stands out especially in:

• AI-driven personalization 
• Intelligent prospect reply management 
• Advanced analytics, filters, and performance dashboards 
• Smooth client and team management at no extra cost

Woodpecker is a good choice for agencies that prioritize manual control.

It works well for those with compliance-heavy workflows. 

But since my original comparison, Saleshandy has closed the gaps that used to hold it back.

It now has a native outbound CRM with Kanban pipeline and prospect timelines.

A built-in browser dialer with AI call summaries. And a significantly upgraded Lead Finder with 800M+ contacts, AI search, and waterfall enrichment.

For teams that want one platform for finding leads, reaching them across email, calls, and LinkedIn, and managing every conversation in a single view, Saleshandy is the more complete option today.

Woodpecker still works well if you need a lightweight, email-focused tool with strong agency panel controls.

But the feature and pricing gap has widened considerably since my last review.

Woodpecker Vs Saleshandy: FAQs

1. Is Saleshandy a good alternative to Woodpecker in 2026?

Saleshandy is the best alternative to Woodpecker. It allows unlimited mailboxes and clients across many plans, whereas Woodpecker limits or charges extra for them.

2. Which is better for cold email outreach: Woodpecker or Saleshandy?

Woodpecker is better for detailed control and more conservative growth. Saleshandy is better for scalability, ease of use, and multiple account management.

3. How does Woodpecker compare to Saleshandy for agencies?

Saleshandy allows unlimited clients/mailboxes, white-label options, more automation for reply tracking, and AI prioritization. It is best for agencies scaling fast. Woodpecker is more focused on controlling deliverability. It fits agencies that want to keep compliance tight, perhaps fewer clients, but more control per account.

4. What are the key differences in pricing between Saleshandy and Woodpecker?

Saleshandy starts around $25/month on an annual plan, for 2,000 contacted prospects. Woodpecker is slightly expensive, at $45/mo on a yearly plan. Saleshandy offers better value for money, while Woodpecker costs more and requires add-ons to achieve a similar scale.

5. What is the best affordable Woodpecker alternative for cold email?

Saleshandy is the best affordable alternative to Woodpecker for many users. Its combination of unlimited mailboxes/clients, AI, automation, and decent pricing makes it reliable. If you have the budget and want a platform that can replace and improve on Woodpecker’s offerings, Saleshandy is the best option.